Commit Graph
37 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
host 6e78449994 feat(docker): 超时不再只剩一句 docker run timeout,留存 partial 与容器日志
2026-10-29 任务 A 教训的收尾:超时路径直接 kill+rm,
--rm 容器一删日志就没了,事后只剩一句 timeout,复发无法
定位(#157 只补了 worker 终态审计,没补容器侧证据)。
修法:_docker_timeout_evidence 先 kill 不 rm,抓 docker
logs 尾 200 行,再 rm;同时取 TimeoutExpired 自带的
partial stdout/stderr(旧代码直接丢了)。三步都 best-effort,
任一步失败都不影响返回 failed。dispatch 与三条 goal 路径
(goal/goal-resume/goal-resume-breakpoint)四处超时点同款
处理:stdout = timeout + partial(优先)或 logs,另存
container_log_tail 与 timeout_partial_stdout 字段;--rm
命令本身不动,不留僵尸容器。
单测 test_docker_sandbox 31 项(含新增超时证据 1 项,
在两个测试类里各跑一次)。
2026-10-30 02:47:11 +08:00
host 92b7f8e8ff feat(tasks): 完整结果另存 result_text_full,详情不再只剩 2000 字
旧链路三层截断:sandbox stdout 截 2000 字、worker 写回截
4000 字,长答案尾部在详情里永远查不到(只把上限调大是
把截断点后移,不是修掉)。修法:截断版保持不变(列表/
摘要用),完整版另存:
- sandbox _result_from_runner/_parse_host_result(local 与
  docker dispatch 路)回包新增 stdout_full(上限 200000 字,
  只防无界增长);goal 路结论在尾部、tail 已保结论,不动。
- worker _write_execution_result 新增 result_text_full 列
  (_ensure_result_columns + server migrate_tasks_table 幂等
  补列),终局与取消分支均透传 stdout_full。
- server:任务 dict 加 result_full_available(不直接塞全文
  进列表负载),新增 GET /tasks/{id}/result-full(read 权限
  同款校验,无完整版时 404,不回摘要冒充完整)。
单测:test_queue_sandbox 45 项(含新增 stdout_full 1 项)、
test_marker_tools 30 项。
2026-10-30 02:45:51 +08:00
host c1d25d11b1 feat: 文档/图片工具进任务镜像 + 结果截断从截断 JSON 改为提取 text 上限 20000 字 2026-10-30 02:03:14 +08:00
host 6f0eec71b6 worker: cover goal docker paths with prestart stage logging
PR #145 added docker_run_* lines only to _run_in_container, but
goal/goal-resume/goal-resume-breakpoint call _call_runner directly
(to keep full stdout for goal conclusions), so the production live
test (a goal task) produced zero docker_run_ lines. Extract a
_docker_call_staged helper and route all four task paths through it;
error lines log the class name then re-raise so each caller's
kill+failed handling is unchanged.

Also fix audit attribution: audit_log has no task_id column, and
worker_exec_done/error details carried no task id, so per-task
queries missed them (the rows existed). All three exec details now
start with task_id=. Tests: 2 new goal-path stage cases + a done
detail task-id assertion (8 total in test_prestart_stages).
2026-10-29 17:46:12 +08:00
host 9d90d97046 worker: prestart stage logging for dispatch stalls
Claim-to-dispatch stalls (cf. 2026-10-29 task A: 61s to interrupted
with zero detail) were invisible because docker run blocks with
captured output and watchdog kills were silent. Add three layers:
- worker_exec_start/done/error audit rows in _run_attempt (PG,
  survives --rm), start/done pairing shows whether an attempt died
  inside the executor call;
- docker_run_start/done/error log lines in DockerExecutor (container
  + image only, never the inner command/prompt);
- stdout tail (last 2000 chars) to the worker log on failed or
  interrupted results, and a log line on both watchdog kill paths.
Tests: cloud/tests/test_prestart_stages.py, 6 cases incl. a
no-prompt-in-logs assertion.
2026-10-29 17:07:53 +08:00
host 585242fc8f 长任务 P0 三件:断点进库、错误分类+熔断、Run/Step 时间线
断点进库:task_checkpoints 表(PG 新库 + 老库幂等补表 + 迁移清单
对齐);worker 在 goal 任务执行期间每 30 秒把磁盘 host-state 断点
镜像进库,终局再补一次;断点续跑认领前,若 host-state 条目丢失
但库里有断点,先按库断点重建最小条目再跑,库里也没有断点时不
造假、走原有拒绝路径。

错误分类+熔断:sandbox 四处解析加永久错误分支(KeyError、配置
缺失等无结论异常退出判 failed 死信,不再判 interrupted;host 已
明言 interrupted 的不受影响,未知错误不分类);worker 自动恢复
加退避(10 秒起指数退避、封顶 300 秒)与无进展熔断(库断点轮次
连续 3 次不变即标 auto_resume_stalled 等人工)。

时间线:task_steps 表 + host 每轮写 host-steps 步骤文件 + worker
导入;GET /tasks/{id}/timeline 一次返回 steps 与 checkpoints;
认领、暂停、自动恢复、终局都记步骤。旧任务返回空数组,不编造。

单测:cloud/tests/test_p0_three.py 14 项(分类、熔断、镜像重建、
步骤导入去重、timeline 接口)。
2026-10-29 15:13:01 +08:00
host a5f2e4e091 fix: 断点丢失时 goal-resume 拒绝成 failed,阻断自动恢复空转
2026-10-29 长任务实弹:Docker goal 断点续跑在 host-state 里找
不到任务时抛 KeyError,worker 把无结论异常退出判 interrupted,
自动恢复再排队、再 KeyError,12 秒一轮空转 49 次(人工暂停
拦下,第 50 次人工续跑又烧掉),文件 32 章原样未动。
修法:host.py goal-resume 先查任务在不在 state 里,不在就打印
拒绝行、正常退出;sandbox 三处解析(本地、Docker resume、
Docker 断点)见拒绝行即判 failed 终态,不进自动恢复循环。
单测:host 缺任务拒绝不炸 + 三处解析拒绝判 failed。
2026-10-29 14:14:13 +08:00
host 5b2bdc9bbf fix: Docker 断点续跑透传密钥环境(SUB2API_API_KEY 缺失空转修法)
Docker goal_resume_breakpoint_task 是唯一漏传
env=self._docker_cli_env(extra_env) 的 goal 方法:密钥只按名
进 docker run,值靠 CLI 环境带;漏传导致容器内 key 为空,
断点后每轮瞬间报 Missing SUB2API_API_KEY、无限空转
(2026-10-29 长任务实弹:274 轮全失败)。

单测:断言断点方法调用 runner 时 CLI 环境含密钥值,
命令里密钥只按名出现不带值。
2026-10-29 12:42:19 +08:00
host a19b1567bb fix: G10 断点续跑透传 model_provider(sub2api 续跑失败修法)
断点续跑容器不带 --model-provider 时 Server 的 provider 表里
没有 sub2api,thread/resume 报 provider not found(probe15 实弹)。
Docker/Local 断点方法加可选 model_provider 并转发,worker 两处
调用点传 gateway_provider;补单测断言断点命令含
--model-provider sub2api(旧代码下两新测试 1 失败 1 报错)。
2026-10-29 11:28:39 +08:00
host 3b2fef95fa 任务内标记工具:task-create/task-poll/task-read 移植、wait-threads 接通、新增 task-cancel/task-retry
- 新模块 cloud/marker_tools.py:纯逻辑解析、校验、快照格式化、
  控制门禁、派生代数与直接上限计数
- sandbox 两处解析提取五种标记块;worker 在 5 处投递点与
  _deliver_peer_messages 同款位置执行,报告排成后续消息下一轮回父任务
- wait 每块 cap 到 8 个目标(与服务端 /wait 对齐,spawn 原先的 10 个收紧),
  每轮最多 2 块;取消/重试门禁:同项目、非自己、非 goal、
  派生链或同创建人,另查 create_task / approve_merge 权限,
  查不到时收紧到仅派生链内
- goal 与协调员任务不解析;单测 30 个,cloud 全量 1043 个、4 跳过、0 失败
2026-10-28 10:13:40 +00:00
host 94137c4a29 goal 异常退出记 interrupted,可断点续跑
长 goal 实弹(2026-10-28):宿主机内存挤兑致回合挂起 59 分钟,恢复时 goal 进程异常退出、无结论行,云端旧语义(returncode 非 0 一律 failed)把可续跑的断点判成终局。

修法:host.py run_goal_loop 回合异常统一记 interrupted 并打印 goal interrupted after rounds 标记行;cloud/sandbox.py 四处 goal 解析同步新语义(标记或无结论非 0 退出 -> interrupted,有结论的非 0 退出仍 failed);worker 终局审计名与状态对齐。单测:sandbox 新测 5 个、host 新测 1 个、更新旧测 1 个;三套件 cloud 1017、host 61、deploy 29 全绿。只本地提交,未推未部署。
2026-10-28 15:18:26 +08:00
host e31fcc6cba feat: G7 分层 fail-open/fail-closed + G8 Docker 轮询掐断 + G9 worker 忽略 host 预算 + G13/G14 归属(第三批)
- G7:认领门 closed 时查配额异常回 quota_check_unavailable、标 interrupted(可重试/续跑);轮询与轮次边界用 open,异常时回 quota_check_failed——新回合边界拒绝,执行中轮询经 _quota_hit 闭包过滤此串、只记 warning 不杀在跑任务,确认超限才掐断;查询函数本身不吞异常冒充不限额。
- G8:Docker 路径加 _docker_call_with_quota_poll(后台线程跑阻塞式 docker 调用,主循环每 quota_poll_interval_seconds 缺省 30 秒查一次,确认超限按容器名真杀容器,结果改写 quota_exceeded 走统一收尾:interrupted、成本照记、续跑消息保留,配额命中后不走 ALREADY_EXISTS 回落);同步路径保持边界检查。
- G9:worker 路径默认忽略 host max_daily_turns(host.py 顶层 --ignore-host-budget 只清该项,Local/Docker 执行器在子命令前追加,worker CLI 缺省开、--no-ignore-host-budget 关);standalone 直接跑 host.py 时预算照常。
- G13/G14:/pr 不再走 system 豁免,建任务前按请求用户查配额(402/503 均不排队不改状态),队列路 pr_jobs.created_by 记请求用户(老表 ALTER 补列),worker 跑 pr 任务时审计操作人用 created_by(老行回落 system)。注意:G14 原案的 system 豁免(服务端与 worker 写死)与 P1 冲突(P1:system 按普通属主走默认额度,不另设无限额系统预算),本次 rebase 未合入该豁免,system 豁免需另行决策。
- 配额口径与 P0/P1 对齐:无配额行按默认额度(非不限额),只有显式 NULL 行才不限额;无价上限只计 source='actual' 行;缺属主(含父任务回查仍无)拒绝新回合。
- README 配额节同步以上口径与 G15 接受现状(best-effort 超支、UTC 月切分、在跑任务只在轮询/轮次边界响应配额改动)。G4 与 G15 不在本批。
2026-10-28 11:14:10 +08:00
host 5883169c82 feat: goal 断点续跑端点(G10)+ 摘要持久化与推送 outbox(G11/G12)
G10:POST /tasks/{id}/goal-resume,仅 interrupted 的 goal 任务,
走 host.py goal-resume(无 --goal-text)从 goal_rounds_done 下一轮
断点续跑,保留原线程与 worktree,状态回 queued 并置
goal_resume_pending(worker 认领后清掉),写 task_goal_resumed
审计;goal-met/unmet、failed、非 goal 一律 409;/continue 开新
循环语义不动。Local/Docker 两路新增 goal_resume_breakpoint_task,
不支持断点的执行器明确失败,绝不回落成 goal 或开新循环。
G11:digest 非失败事件持久化进 push_digest_events,worker 循环
每小时按(项目、订阅)分组汇总发一条,失败类仍即时发。
G12:webhook/slack 投递失败写 push_outbox,worker 循环后台重试
(最多 3 次、默认 60 秒退避),3 次仍失败删行并记日志,不丢
任务状态;缺凭证与无 sender 不进 outbox;文档写明 at-least-once
下 webhook/slack 可能重复,接收方须去重。
测试:cloud 769(4 跳过)、host 68、deploy 19 全过。
2026-10-28 11:09:29 +08:00
host 1402dc67fd P1 security batch: quota execution checks, cost accounting, goal/coordinator semantics, PR channel, orphan signature, control-plane and console hardening
- Docker quota watchdog + fail-closed quota checks, system tasks need real owner
- max_cost_usd actually accumulated, cancel records cost, estimated rows excluded from unpriced cap, cache_write declared non-billed
- goal-resume keeps original verify on breakpoint resume, goal retry falls back to resume, goal_max_rounds capped at 100 at create and execution
- coordinator children inherit parent model/effort, orphans marked interrupted with audit
- PR jobs on docker workers return explicit needs_local_worker instead of silent empty
- worker code signature covers 6 files and is checked before claim, fail-closed
- sub2api lazy provisioning with rotation, backup whitelist + 0600, push SSRF block, repos/workers desensitized, key/project audits and limits, console buttons/quota/status wording, coordinator/automation quota reserve
2026-10-27 16:27:50 +00:00
host 4936db3c47 fix: docker 默认 runner 支持 env + 并发开通竞态复用
翻转实弹暴露的两个 #88 缺口:
- _docker_default_runner 不接受 env,_call_runner 遇 env 即 loud fail,
  导致 sub2api 路径下所有 docker 任务失败(xcmapi 路径不传 env,
  此前未暴露)。默认 runner 现接受 env 并与进程环境合并后传给
  docker CLI 子进程(-e <名> 由此解析,值绝不进 argv)。
- 同一用户两任务并发开通时建号撞 email 已存在:现轮询复用
  胜出者入库的行,等不到再原错抛出。
测试:sub2api 16、docker 沙箱 29;全量 cloud 789(4 跳过)、
host 65、deploy 19 全绿。
2026-10-27 17:59:04 +08:00
host ec47328d3c sub2api 网关接入:每用户独立账号 + 任务注入 + 网关可配置
- cloud/sub2api.py:管理 API 客户端(管理员登录/token 刷新/
  建用户/以用户发 key/删用户/查组/网关模型目录)+ 幂等开通
  ensure_user_gateway_key(入库失败尽力清理孤儿 key 与账号)
- worker:网关门(sub2api 时按 created_by 幂等开通,失败任务
  直接 failed;协调员子任务跟父任务属主)+ 默认模型走网关
  目录首个;三条执行路径(Local popen/同步、Docker 同步)注
  入任务级 env 与 --model-provider;NO_PROXY 追加网关 host
- host.py:--model-provider,sub2api 时以 -c 注入 provider 表
  (不改租户 config.toml);未配 SUB2API_BASE_URL 时 loud fail
- sandbox:Local/Docker 执行器传 --model-provider 与任务 env;
  docker 密钥只传名(-e SUB2API_API_KEY),值由 CLI 子进程
  环境提供,绝不进 argv;runner 不支持 env 时 loud fail
- server:OAuth 建号 best-effort 开通;/relay/models 走调用者
  自己的网关模型目录;init_db 补 user_gateway_keys 表
- 测试:新单测 11 个;全量 cloud 679(4 跳过)、host 65、
  deploy 19 全过
- 诚实边界:真模型调用实弹需上游账号挂组后才做;切流前
  xcmapi 保持现网
2026-10-27 17:22:54 +08:00
host dbcc8e641a feat: 任务列表显示 turn_id 与 root_turn_id
host.py dispatch 打印补 turn_id/root_turn_id;执行器解析(local/Docker)透传;worker 写回 tasks 新列(新值非空才覆盖);server 迁移与接口字段;控制台任务列表新增 turn/root turn 两列(短显+悬停全文);新单测 9 个。
2026-10-27 14:52:00 +08:00
host ef30558f7c feat: 任务间互发消息(API + agent 标记块,不中断任务)
同项目任务互发消息、对方做完可回消息:API POST /tasks/<目标>/messages
(from_task_id,目标项目 create_task + 发送项目 read 鉴权)与 agent
回合输出标记块(worker 回合后解析投递,不用联网、不用凭证,本地
与 Docker 都通)。投递不中断任务:对方运行中/排队中排成后续消息
(轮次边界执行,direct 优先);对方终态则续跑复活(resume_message +
queued),A→B→A 往返不受回合时序影响。拒绝项:自己、跨项目、goal
目标、已合并、复活位被占;每轮最多 5 块,仅 completed 轮次投递;
目标执行时配额门照常生效。控制台后续消息列显示发送方,新增给
其他任务发消息框(落已代理的 /tasks 下,不用改 nginx)。

测试:新增 test_peer_messages(15)、test_peer_messages_server(8)、
test_worker_peer(4);全量 cloud 654、host 64、deploy 19 全过(cloud 4 跳过)。
2026-10-27 14:12:28 +08:00
host 3a4997d346 feat: 旧任务继续会话——终端任务带新消息 + 全部选项同一会话续跑
server:POST /tasks/{id}/continue(终端非 merged 任务重排队,
resume_message 列存本轮消息,不传选项沿用原值,plan/goal 冲突
与新建一致,goal_mode=1 时转新 goal 语义;CAS 防并发改状态,
审计 task_continued);tasks.resume_message 三处迁移 + PG 建表。
worker:认领后本轮 prompt 换成续跑消息(只换内存副本),
goal 续跑走 goal-resume 而不是 goal,跑完清 resume_message
(进程被杀时不清,下次认领重跑同一条消息)。
host:goal-resume --goal-text(旧任务接续 goal 模式:跳过状态
与记录守卫,旧线程上从第 1 轮开新目标循环,新语义不限轮次;
无线程时拒绝)。
sandbox:Local/Docker goal_resume_task + popen goal-resume kind;
附带 popen goal 命令改成新语义(无验收不传 --verify,轮次 0
原样传,此前 goal 任务到本地 worker 会直接报错)。
console:详情页终端非 merged 任务出继续会话表单(消息 +
模型/强度/权限/计划/goal,模型下拉复用中转列表)。
测试:新增 test_task_continue.py 11 个 + test_host_continue.py 2 个。
2026-10-27 04:40:11 +08:00
host 7c444a688b feat: 任务附件——server/worker/console 链路打通(+ popen goal 新语义补漏)
server:POST /uploads(multipart,413 预检、路径/数量/大小校验、
24h 过期包、used 防一包多用)+ 建任务绑定(同事务写附件行 +
包置 used,cloud 执行器 400)+ 列表/详情带 attachments +
取消删暂存 + 分支带走附件清单;db.py PG 建表 + init_db 补表。
worker:_task_seed_dir(无附件/目录已删静默 None)+ dispatch/
goal 三路(同步本地、popen、Docker 只读挂载 /tmp/codex-seed)
+ cloud 执行器兜底失败 + 终局删暂存。
console:文件/文件夹/图片三路输入,先上传拿 upload_id 再建任务,
列表 [附件×n]、详情列附件路径。
附带:popen 的 goal 命令此前强制要求 verify_command,goal 新语义
任务到本地 worker(走 popen)会直接报错,改成与同步 goal_task
一致(无验收不传 --verify,轮次 0 原样传)。
测试:新增 test_task_attachments.py 15 个。
2026-10-27 04:30:43 +08:00
openqjandhost c86b450851 feat: goal 模式新语义——prompt 即目标,无验收命令,不限轮次,模型宣告完成 (#67)
console 打勾 goal 模式时不再有专用 goal 文本、验收命令、轮次
三个输入(已移除,换成说明行),只发 goal_mode=1;server 侧
goal_mode=1 时 goal 存 prompt、验收命令空、轮次存 0,带验收
命令或与计划模式同用时 400,旧的带验收命令任务照原样可用。

host.py goal 循环:verify 为空时不跑验测,轮次提示里写明
标记约定;模型在完整跑完的回合末尾单独一行输出“目标已
达成”即达标(超时回合的部分文本含标记也不算);--max-rounds
0 为不限轮次,goal-resume 续跑按 0 处理(不用 or 兜底成 3)。
刹车只有取消与预算耗尽(后者记 interrupted、可续跑)。

迁移与 worker:tasks 加 goal_mode 列(server 迁移、worker 列
补齐、PG schema 三处同步);worker 按 goal_mode 或
verify_command 判定 goal 路径,重试与后续消息排空对新语义
同样只跑一次/不排空;Local/Docker goal_task 的 --verify 可选、
--max-rounds 0 原样传。

Co-authored-by: host <host@test.local>
2026-10-27 03:54:48 +08:00
openqjandhost f4443dca4f feat: 计划模式 + 后续消息 + 会话分支接云端 (#65)
- 计划模式:tasks 加 plan 列;plan 与 approval=full / goal 冲突时
  400;执行器在 approval 参数后追加 --sandbox read-only(本地
  dispatch/run/goal/popen 与 Docker 内层命令全覆盖),host 任务
  存下 sandbox 后续轮次自动继承只读。
- 后续消息:新表 task_followups;POST/GET /tasks/{id}/followups
  (仅 queued/running 的非 goal 任务;direct 立即往链路追加
  phase=followup-direct 条目,本轮跑完后优先于排队执行;排队
  按 direct 优先、队内先来先服务逐条再跑一轮,同一 thread;
  一条失败即停、剩余 pending 留给重试入口;取消时回 pending)。
- 会话分支:POST /tasks/{id}/fork(仅终态任务;继承 executor/
  模型/强度/权限/计划,goal 字段置空);worker 先 fork 再跑首轮,
  首轮失败不自动重试、不重复分叉,失败后走重试入口重跑首轮。
- 修任务级模型被覆盖:worker 此前无条件写成主模型,控制台
  选的模型实际不生效;现为任务级 > worker 主模型 > 配置。
- Docker 租户准备抽成 _docker_task_context,供普通尝试与 fork 共用。
- console:新建任务计划勾选(含冲突拦截)、详情计划徽标与
  分支来源、分支按钮与表单、后续消息区、列表 [计划]/[分支] 标记。
- 测试:cloud/tests/test_task_links.py 17 个(server 校验与继承、
  worker 模型优先、只读命令、排空顺序与停排、goal 不排空、
  fork 单次性);全量 cloud 542、host 49、deploy 14。

Co-authored-by: host <host@test.local>
2026-10-27 03:17:51 +08:00
openqjandhost 8b2f3968dc feat: per-task model/effort/approval + relay models endpoint (#59)
Co-authored-by: host <host@test.local>
2026-10-27 01:44:53 +08:00
host 63823fc2e3 逐任务真实成本:上游用量事件 + 价目表计价
此前每任务只记一条 estimated(字符数/4,金额为空),注释称
host 协议不暴露真实 token 数。本轮实测推翻了该前提:
- account/usage/read 在中继上是死的(要求 ChatGPT 账号登录),
  不是来源,已在 cost.py docstring 写明死胡同
- app-server 每上游补全发 thread/tokenUsage/updated,last 是该次
  补全的用量;中继 5 调用回合实测 last 之和等于最后 total
  (input/output/cached/reasoning 四路都对得上)

实现:host.py run_turn 从事件窗口按 threadId+turnId 汇总用量,
重试/goal 各轮累加,dispatch/run JSON 与 goal 用量行透传;
sandbox 三路解析(dispatch JSON 解析改用完整 stdout,顺带修
了长 text 下 failed 被误判 completed 的潜 bug);worker 每任务
记一条 actual(重试/fallback 用量累加进同一条),无用量时回落
estimated;cost.py 价目表(默认 OpenAI 挂牌价,env 可覆盖,
无价模型 usd 记 None、报表进 unpriced_actual_tokens 而非 0 美元),
cost_records 加 cached_input_tokens 列(SQLite/PG 两支迁移);
报表与按天行新增 cached_input_tokens/unpriced_actual_tokens。
测试:host 32、cloud 483 全过。
2026-10-26 18:41:27 +08:00
host 5ee9d291dd 云端 goal/merge/review 三事件:goal 循环 + PR 事件通知
此前 goal-unmet/merge-failed/review-requested 只有允许列表,
云端没有生产者(概念只在本地 host.py)。本轮给三者接真生产者:
- goal:POST /tasks 接受 goal/verify_command/goal_max_rounds
  (迁移补列,SQLite 与 Postgres 两支);带 verify_command 的
  任务走 host.py goal 循环(Local/Docker 执行器 goal_task,
  turn→验测→喂回重试,缺省 3 轮);达标 completed,未达标
  failed 且只发 goal-unmet、不重复发 failed;goal 模式下 worker
  级重试/fallback 关闭,同任务 /retry 会撞 host 任务名已存在
  (已在文档写明,须新建任务);CloudExecutor 无 goal 概念,
  如实失败不降级
- review-requested:POST /tasks/{id}/pr 建 PR 成功时发
  (payload 含 pr_url/pr_number)
- merge-failed:PR 落盘(push/建 PR)失败 502 时发(payload
  含 step/error),任务保持 merged、可重调 /pr;跳过时不发
测试:host 29、cloud 469 全过。
2026-10-26 18:11:12 +08:00
host 9f05178f2b Docker tasks: --docker-runtime option (runsc support, default off)
DockerExecutor gains a runtime parameter (passed as docker --runtime
in build_run_command, after --pids-limit); worker CLI gains
--docker-runtime, wired through _build_cli_executor. Unset or empty
means no --runtime flag, so existing tasks keep docker default (runc);
an unregistered runtime fails container start (fail closed), it never
silently falls back. Tests: runsc appears in the command, default/empty
omit it, CLI wiring passes through. README documents the flag and
corrects a stale multi-tenant note (host kernel does not ban userns;
bwrap fails inside Docker containers on nested-pidns proc mount).
2026-10-26 10:26:21 +08:00
host 1e4623c61c Outer hardening: AppArmor profile, pids limit, egress allowlist proxy
Inner codex sandbox stays danger-full-access by choice (bwrap
path is a separate decision); this hardens everything around it:
- DockerExecutor: --security-opt plumbing (repeatable, dedups
  no-new-privileges), --pids-limit (CLI default 512, fork-bomb
  guard), per-call extra_env (-e NAME=VALUE, non-secrets only,
  e.g. proxy URLs; the model key still goes by -e NAME only).
- Worker: --egress-proxy-port (0 = off). When on, Docker task
  containers get HTTP(S)_PROXY pointing at the host filtering
  proxy via their network gateway IP (tenant network gateway
  or default bridge gateway). Gateway unresolvable => the
  attempt fails instead of running unproxied (fail closed,
  same rule as tenant network creation failure).
- AppArmor profile deploy/apparmor/docker-codex: docker-default
  base + deny network raw/packet, deny ptrace, deny mount/
  umount/pivot_root, deny dangerous capabilities, deny writes
  to /proc/sys, /sys, /proc/keys. Deliberately NO userns rule
  (that would enable the bwrap path, not this one). File rules
  mirror docker-default (broad + sensitive denies); a strict
  file allowlist would need profiling codex's file access set
  and is not claimed here.
- Egress proxy deploy/egress/: Tinyproxy with
  FilterDefaultDeny + anchored domain allowlist (relay,
  github, pypi, npm). Anchoring matters: an unanchored
  'github.com' regex would also match 'evilgithub.com'.
- Seccomp honesty (README): Docker default seccomp already
  enforces on all task containers; no new stricter allowlist
  is claimed in this change (building one from memory risks
  silently breaking the toolchain; it needs syscall profiling
  first).
Tests: 3 outer-hardening tests (security-opt dedup, pids
limit, proxy env without leaking the key value, gateway
parse/fail, proxy fail-closed). Full suites pass.
2026-10-26 07:42:14 +08:00
host 03a98124db Multi-tenant isolation for Docker tasks (per-project mounts + networks + drop caps)
Container-side isolation was project-blind: every task mounted
the shared /app/work (all worktrees + host-state), the shared
codex-home (all thread history), the shared repos dir and the
shared test-repo, and all containers shared the default bridge
network. With --tenant-isolation (Docker only; Local runs on
the host under one user and has no container boundary to
enforce), each project gets its own host dirs under
tenants_root/<project>/{work,codex-home,test-repo,<project>}:
- mounts: container paths stay identical (/app/work,
  codex-home, repos/<pid>, test-repo) so host.py config needs
  no change; only the host mount sources are per-project.
  Static --docker-extra-mounts are replaced per task (not
  appended), so a shared mount cannot leak back in.
- codex-home seeds ONLY the template's config.toml (relay
  endpoint/provider names, no secret values); thread_history
  is never copied (it holds other tasks' prompts/results).
  test-repo is a per-project copy of the fixture (worktree
  creation needs a writable repo; a shared writable fixture
  would let one tenant poison the next task's base code).
- repos: repo_url checkouts go to the tenant dir and task
  repo is set to the container path; no-repo_url tasks get
  the tenant test-repo copy instead of the shared fixture.
- network: one Docker network per project (codex-<pid>,
  created idempotently, already-exists is OK); network
  creation failure fails the task instead of silently
  falling back to the default network (a silent downgrade
  would make isolation fail quietly).
- hardening for all Docker runs: --cap-drop=ALL and
  --security-opt=no-new-privileges (non-root user was already
  the case); verified live by a good-model task, not assumed.
Honest limit, kept in README: the inner codex sandbox is
still danger-full-access (host kernel blocks user namespaces,
bwrap unusable), so the boundary is container + mounts +
network, not the inner sandbox.
Tests: 7 tenant tests (seeding incl. no-history, per-project
mounts, network sanitization, per-call override, ensure
network ok/fail). Full suites pass.
2026-10-26 07:24:54 +08:00
host d51c06a900 Worker concurrency (capacity enforced), survival (heartbeat/sweep/drain), retry endpoint
1. Concurrency: capacity is now a real limit, not display-only.
   run_all with capacity>1 runs a manual thread pool (threading,
   not concurrent.futures: a test in this repo puts cloud/ on
   sys.path, shadowing stdlib queue and breaking
   concurrent.futures' SimpleQueue import). Claim stays CAS, so
   two threads racing one task still yield one owner; max_tasks
   counts dispatched+running to avoid overshoot; stop signals
   stop new claims only, running tasks are drained by run_loop.
   Running state moved from single fields to a _running dict
   (proc/container per task) so cancel kills the right task.
   Docker timeout is now a per-call argument, never a mutated
   shared executor field. CostStore opens a fresh connection per
   record/report (shared sqlite connection is thread-bound and
   raised ProgrammingError under the pool; :memory: keeps the
   shared connection because a fresh one is an empty DB).
   Final status write is CAS on status='running' so a background
   thread cannot overwrite an interrupted task with completed.
2. Survival: run_loop starts a daemon heartbeat thread (every
   30s, refreshes running tasks' last_heartbeat) and sweeps stale
   tasks every round (threshold 300s, best-effort); live tasks
   never go stale now, dead workers' tasks are reclaimed without
   manual /admin/sweep. On exit, run_loop waits up to
   drain_timeout (CLI --drain-timeout, default 60s, inside
   systemd's 90s stop window) for running tasks before killing
   leftovers and marking interrupted.
3. Retry: POST /tasks/{id}/retry (maintainer+, 404/403/409):
   failed/interrupted/merge-failed go back to queued with
   result/error/model cleared, prompt/model/deps kept, CAS
   update, audit task_retried.
Tests: 5 concurrency tests (barrier overlap, serial capacity=1,
max_tasks, wait_for_running, CAS final write), 3 retry tests;
full suites pass.
2026-10-26 06:46:20 +08:00
host 7ce603b610 Real model fallback retry (opt-in, at most once)
Worker previously only recorded a model_fallback event on a
fallbackable failure and failed the task; ModelRouter.next_after
was never used to actually run the task on another model.
With --fallback-models (default empty = off, old behaviour
unchanged), a fallbackable failure (404/429/5xx/timeout; 401/400
and cancellations never fall back) now re-runs the same task,
same worktree/branch, on the first fallback model via host.py's
top-level --model flag (no host.py signature change). The second
attempt's result is final: actual_model is the fallback model,
fallback_count=1, and a double failure keeps both reasons in
error_text. LocalExecutor/DockerExecutor pass task model through
to host.py; CloudExecutor includes model only when set.
2026-10-26 05:23:52 +08:00
host 306cdf0d0c Cloud dispatch pool + auto PR (opt-in, skip clearly)
Worker pool: workers table + register/heartbeat (heartbeat is
registration, no 404), GET /workers with alive (120s default),
POST /workers/heartbeat (X-API-Key, missing worker_id 400).
Tasks gain executor (local/docker/cloud, None = any worker);
worker claim filters by executor in pick_next and in the CAS
WHERE clause, CAS semantics unchanged; CloudExecutor _name
now correctly returns cloud, not local.
CloudExecutor: generic HTTP runner interface (endpoint from
explicit arg or CLOUD_RUNNER_ENDPOINT, auth header name only,
token value only from env into the request header, never into
logs/body/errors); no endpoint configured = explicit failure,
never silent downgrade. Vendor adapters (ECS/Cloud Run) are
out of scope, documented as such.
Auto PR: projects.auto_pr (0/1, create-time only, no PATCH
route exists); POST /tasks/{id}/pr (maintainer+ via
approve_merge) only for merged tasks (else 409); skip reasons
in order: auto_pr_disabled, no_worktree, no_remote, no_gh,
gh_not_authenticated — all return 200 with pr_skipped, task
stays merged, no push attempted; push/pr-create failure
returns 502 with step, task stays merged; success writes
pr_url/pr_number and audits pr_created. No default auto-push
from the worker. Remote URLs in errors are scrubbed of
userinfo; gh credentials are managed by gh itself, never
stored by the control plane.
Tests: host 27 pass, cloud 323 pass (8 skipped are
environment-dependent real-Postgres tests).
2026-10-26 04:57:37 +08:00
host 29dcae4513 Hotfix: stale-container cleanup must not delete infra containers
Worker startup cleanup previously deleted every container whose
name started with codex-, including the codex-postgres database
container. On the external host the first worker restart after
the prod-grade deploy deleted codex-postgres, leaving the
control plane unable to connect to Postgres (connection refused
on 127.0.0.1:5432, server auto-restart loop).
Fix: cleanup only deletes codex-<32-hex task id> containers,
which is exactly the name DockerExecutor gives task containers;
infrastructure names like codex-postgres never match and are
never deleted. Regression test covers postgres + non-hex names.
2026-10-26 03:59:54 +08:00
host 33841355b5 Production-grade: webhook execution, Postgres backup, rate limit, worker timeout/retry
GitHub webhook: delivery-id dedup persisted in webhook_deliveries,
/fix-review creates a queued task with audit (no model run in the
webhook itself), check_run/check_suite parsing without mutating
task state (CI backfill still via pr-checks).
Control plane: Postgres pg_dump backup branch + POST /admin/backup
(maintainer+, password only via PGPASSWORD env), per-key/IP rate
limit (default 120/min, 429), health returns backend + db_ok,
metrics by_status always has all seven status keys.
Worker: per-task timeout (default 1800s, --task-timeout), timeout
is failed not interrupted, limited retries (default 1, backoff,
fallback failures not re-retried), stale codex- container cleanup
on loop/CLI start.
Tests: cloud 271 (267 pass, 4 skipped are pre-existing real-
Postgres tests), host 27 pass.
2026-10-26 03:55:07 +08:00
host 07a8eaaa73 Docker sandbox real test + cloud merge status endpoint
- DockerExecutor: extra mounts (host.py work/state, repo, codex-home
  at same paths), worker --docker-extra-mounts, container user
  configurable; Dockerfile copies codex-resources beside the codex
  binary and puts bwrap on PATH (previous /usr/local/lib layout
  made codex report bubblewrap unavailable inside the container).
- Real Docker task on external host: triple added in ~18s, merged
  inside a container, main repo now add+mul2+triple, --rm cleanup.
  Honest boundary: this host/kernel forbids unprivileged user
  namespaces, so bwrap fails on host and in containers; production
  mode here is Docker isolation + inner danger-full-access, not
  double sandboxing.
- Cloud merge status: POST /tasks/{id}/merge syncs status only
  (merge itself stays with host.py merge); completed -> merged,
  maintainer+ (approve_merge), other states and repeat calls 409,
  audit merge_task. Tests: cloud 223, host 27, all passing.
2026-10-26 02:46:10 +08:00
host 631580beab cloud: production gaps (worker loop + true cancel, task result columns + migration, DB interface migration, metrics + backup) 2026-10-26 01:53:33 +08:00
host 07ef869267 cloud: worker dispatch, DB abstraction, packaging 0.1.0, repo CI workflow 2026-10-26 01:44:15 +08:00
host b74d99e959 cloud: production control plane (API, auth/RBAC, queue, sandbox, memory/KB, fallback/cost, webhooks) 2026-10-26 01:23:21 +08:00